PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.37%
Negative revenue growth while ENPH stands at 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
13.53%
Positive gross profit growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
15.18%
Positive EBIT growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.86%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ENPH's 26.34%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 24.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Negative EPS growth while ENPH is at 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ENPH is at 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.33%
Slight or no buybacks while ENPH is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.54%
Slight or no buyback while ENPH is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.18%
Positive OCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
743.93%
Positive FCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
495.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
205.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ENPH's 112.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while ENPH shows 17.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.88%
Inventory is declining while ENPH stands at 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.42%
Asset growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.64%
Under 50% of ENPH's 9.32%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.68%
We increase R&D while ENPH cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.64%
We expand SG&A while ENPH cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.