SunPower Corporation (SPWR)

Negative revenue growth while ENPH stands at 15.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while ENPH is at 19.34%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while ENPH is at 110.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while ENPH is at 110.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while ENPH stands at 167.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while ENPH is at 166.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while ENPH is at 166.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Diluted share count expanding well above ENPH's 0.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

OCF growth under 50% of ENPH's 158.25%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.

FCF growth under 50% of ENPH's 180.72%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ENPH stands at 16.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while ENPH stands at 89.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ENPH's 27276.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.

Below 50% of ENPH's 620.85%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ENPH stands at 92.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ENPH is at 212.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ENPH stands at 648.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.

Below 50% of ENPH's 532.10%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ENPH is at 50.74%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.