PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-71.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
104.85%
Positive operating income growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-82.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-83.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.76%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
6.32%
Slight or no buybacks while ENPH is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
115.49%
Slight or no buyback while ENPH is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
Positive OCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
89.76%
Positive FCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-69.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ENPH stands at 36.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-61.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while ENPH stands at 62.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.88%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
96.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ENPH's 240.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
96.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ENPH's 15.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
94.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
239.80%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ENPH's 256.78%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
1296.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
153.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-109.80%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ENPH stands at 514.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-2088.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ENPH is at 140.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-153.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ENPH is at 160.77%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.40%
AR growth well above ENPH's 0.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-50.20%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while ENPH is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.20%
Positive BV/share change while ENPH is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.