PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.48%
Revenue growth of 19.48% while FSLR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
32.65%
Positive gross profit growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
66.29%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
66.29%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
77.71%
Net income growth of 77.71% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
75.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x FSLR's 4.37%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
62.50%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FSLR's 7.14%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
7.66%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 4.43%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.47%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 7.81%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.62%
OCF growth of 44.62% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-188.13%
Negative FCF growth while FSLR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.93%
AR growth of 28.93% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
20.88%
Inventory growth of 20.88% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.08%
Asset growth of 4.08% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-4.55%
We have a declining book value while FSLR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.01%
Our R&D shrinks while FSLR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
24.49%
SG&A growth of 24.49% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.