PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.00%
Positive revenue growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.01%
Positive gross profit growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
74.46%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.20%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
146.08%
Positive net income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
162.24%
Positive EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
144.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.71%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 5.83%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 4.66%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-431.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1092.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
9.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 3082.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 3082.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 950.17%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
82.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 82.72% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
82.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 82.72% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
82.72%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 82.72% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
107.35%
Below 50% of FSLR's 707.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
107.35%
Below 50% of FSLR's 707.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
107.35%
Below 50% of FSLR's 11422.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.66%
Our AR growth while FSLR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
33.95%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 45.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.31%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSLR's 7.72%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.35%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.16%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. FSLR's 7.40%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.58%
SG&A growth well above FSLR's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.