PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.37%
Negative revenue growth while FSLR stands at 30.58%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
13.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FSLR's 35.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
15.18%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSLR's 46.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
18.86%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSLR's 46.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 42.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Negative EPS growth while FSLR is at 41.38%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSLR is at 41.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.33%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.69%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 0.53%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.18%
OCF growth above 1.5x FSLR's 131.88%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
743.93%
FCF growth above 1.5x FSLR's 141.17%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
495.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 1727.92%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
205.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 205.81% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.87%
Below 50% of FSLR's 24018.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 291.84% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.74%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.88%
Inventory is declining while FSLR stands at 18.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.42%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSLR's 11.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.64%
Under 50% of FSLR's 10.00%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. FSLR's 28.83%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.64%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSLR's 14.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.