PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FSLR's 3.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-69.23%
Negative gross profit growth while FSLR is at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
578.63%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.20%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-149.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-150.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-150.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.43%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.41%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.94%
Reduced diluted shares while FSLR is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-459.13%
Negative OCF growth while FSLR is at 144.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-402.94%
Negative FCF growth while FSLR is at 23.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
331.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 8751.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
331.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 2821.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
73.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 551.29%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-165.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-165.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1141.78%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 580.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
81.92%
Below 50% of FSLR's 2031.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
81.92%
Below 50% of FSLR's 36527.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
8.58%
Below 50% of FSLR's 206.34%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.44%
Below 50% of FSLR's 435.45%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSLR shows 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.78%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 12.89%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.06%
Asset growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 4.54%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.53%
Under 50% of FSLR's 5.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-12.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
7.68%
We increase R&D while FSLR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
25.74%
SG&A growth well above FSLR's 17.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.