PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.13%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-41.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
83.00%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
84.65%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
77.59%
Positive net income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
77.72%
Positive EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.72%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.54%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.54%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
521.21%
Positive OCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
2000.43%
Positive FCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7082.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 9705.86%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
409.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 719.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
15.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 41.86%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5951.95%
OCF/share CAGR of 5951.95% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
311.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
141.29%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-498.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-595.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-331.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.78%
Below 50% of FSLR's 479.43%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2.84%
Below 50% of FSLR's 124.35%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSLR shows 4.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.77%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FSLR's 9.93%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.95%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-5.96%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.76%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FSLR's 9.09%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-5.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
0.03%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSLR's 11.46%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.