PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.65%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-42.24%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-90.10%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-90.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-78.32%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-79.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-78.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
6.18%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.56%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-2.56%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-361.62%
Negative OCF growth while FSLR is at 137.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-675.31%
Negative FCF growth while FSLR is at 115.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
320.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 6844.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
19.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-35.46%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-194.25%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-3372.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR is at 339.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
6.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 150.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
130.22%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSLR's 146.58%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-31.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
107.18%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.04%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 70.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.98%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.34%
AR growth well above FSLR's 4.82%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x FSLR's 3.70%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
19.49%
We have some new debt while FSLR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.99%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.