PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.52%
Positive revenue growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-124.82%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-481.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2818.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-578.55%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-586.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-586.21%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSLR's 0.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
478.71%
Similar OCF growth to FSLR's 505.49%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
293.13%
FCF growth similar to FSLR's 308.81%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
554.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 394.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
28.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
643.25%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 1150.49%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
156.27%
Below 50% of FSLR's 2273.02%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1197.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 53.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-1257.38%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-133.75%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1180.57%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-1.90%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 587.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-44.19%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 18.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-20.78%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 10.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-10.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-10.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-16.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-28.73%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-15.25%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-16.93%
We cut SG&A while FSLR invests at 16.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.