PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.91%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
41.64%
Positive gross profit growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-127.98%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
67.92%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-262.89%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-258.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-258.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Slight or no buybacks while FSLR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-1.38%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4410.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1144.84%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-54.29%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-14.73%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-17.78%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
48.68%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
31.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
40.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 54.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
71.54%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSLR's 92.11%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
80.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
70.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 36.29%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-81.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 50.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-65.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
202.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 14.05%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while FSLR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.03%
Our AR growth while FSLR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
14.54%
Inventory growth well above FSLR's 26.18%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.03%
Positive asset growth while FSLR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.97%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-3.03%
We’re deleveraging while FSLR stands at 5.07%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
14.78%
We increase R&D while FSLR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
0.50%
We expand SG&A while FSLR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.