PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-97.19%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
65.81%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.01%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
65.32%
Positive net income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
71.83%
Positive EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
71.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-71.98%
Share reduction while FSLR is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-72.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.45%
Positive OCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
85.98%
Positive FCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-96.39%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-91.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 46.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.57%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-124.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 178.38%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
90.42%
Below 50% of FSLR's 186.69%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 195.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-136.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FSLR is at 96.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
69.14%
Below 50% of FSLR's 443.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 11.98%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-118.50%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 38.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
14.22%
Below 50% of FSLR's 32.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-182.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 20.28%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-98.94%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-96.97%
Negative asset growth while FSLR invests at 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-199.02%
We have a declining book value while FSLR shows 3.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-81.21%
We’re deleveraging while FSLR stands at 9.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-47.57%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.