PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Negative revenue growth while FSLR stands at 27.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while FSLR is at 43.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while FSLR is at 56.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.85%
Negative operating income growth while FSLR is at 56.36%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 47.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while FSLR is at 47.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSLR is at 47.73%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
149.04%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
149.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
Positive OCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
44.58%
Positive FCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-99.06%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 73.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-98.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 66.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-97.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 59.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
97.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 52.55%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
96.13%
Below 50% of FSLR's 1269.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-117.25%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 8.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-219.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FSLR is at 7118.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-115.25%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSLR is 1913.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-129.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR is 320.84%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-107.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 45.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
32.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSLR's 36.01%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-129.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 24.59%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-26.69%
Inventory is declining while FSLR stands at 5.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-18.26%
Negative asset growth while FSLR invests at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
56.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSLR's 4.98%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.