PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-71.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
104.85%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-82.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-83.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.76%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
6.32%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
115.49%
Slight or no buyback while FSLR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
Positive OCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
89.76%
Positive FCF growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-69.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FSLR stands at 67.80%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-61.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 126.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
96.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.92%
Positive OCF/share growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
239.80%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 413.58%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
1296.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 127.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
153.46%
Below 50% of FSLR's 577.08%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-109.80%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 53.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-2088.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 56.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-153.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 37.24%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.40%
AR growth well above FSLR's 55.69%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-50.20%
Inventory is declining while FSLR stands at 18.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while FSLR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.20%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSLR's 2.57%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
We cut SG&A while FSLR invests at 7.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.