PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.00%
Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
23.23%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MAXN's 73.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
49.67%
EBIT growth 50-75% of MAXN's 71.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
49.67%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of MAXN's 66.50%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
139.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.10%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
110.69%
EPS growth of 110.69% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
109.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
162.28%
Share change of 162.28% while MAXN is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
187.19%
Diluted share change of 187.19% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7700.00%
Negative OCF growth while MAXN is at 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.87%
Negative FCF growth while MAXN is at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-78.34%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-78.34%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-78.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
97.87%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
97.87%
Positive OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.87%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
100.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
100.20%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
100.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.40%
Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
31.67%
We show growth while MAXN is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.21%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-61.69%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
329.37%
We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.