PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.22%
Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
401.45%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
9.96%
EBIT growth below 50% of MAXN's 71.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.07%
Operating income growth under 50% of MAXN's 66.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
19.72%
Net income growth under 50% of MAXN's 73.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-40.00%
Negative EPS growth while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MAXN is at 73.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while MAXN is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.05%
Reduced diluted shares while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.96%
Negative OCF growth while MAXN is at 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-175.51%
Negative FCF growth while MAXN is at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6103.75%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6103.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
295.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MAXN's 7.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2525.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2525.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
15668.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
358.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
358.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1436.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.87%
Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
31.97%
We show growth while MAXN is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.73%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.37%
Positive BV/share change while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
12.52%
We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-126.33%
Our R&D shrinks while MAXN invests at 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.