PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.90%
Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.90%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MAXN's 73.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
58.94%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MAXN's 71.83%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
-46.05%
Negative operating income growth while MAXN is at 66.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
42.34%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MAXN's 73.10%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
42.25%
EPS growth of 42.25% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
42.25%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of MAXN's 73.09%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.39%
Share change of 0.39% while MAXN is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.86%
OCF growth under 50% of MAXN's 93.92%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
35.38%
FCF growth under 50% of MAXN's 91.23%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
10.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MAXN's 7.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.95%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-132.01%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-476.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-298.04%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.06%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-34.13%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.90%
Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.50%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.24%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.97%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
6.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.58%
We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.