SunPower Corporation (SPWR)

Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

EBIT growth above 1.5x MAXN's 71.83%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.

Operating income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 66.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Net income growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.10%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.

EPS growth of 329.17% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.

Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.

OCF growth above 1.5x MAXN's 93.92%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

FCF growth above 1.5x MAXN's 91.23%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MAXN's 7.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Positive 10Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

We show growth while MAXN is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.