PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-67.59%
Negative gross profit growth while MAXN is at 73.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-154.70%
Negative EBIT growth while MAXN is at 71.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-167.27%
Negative operating income growth while MAXN is at 66.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-126.58%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 73.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-129.27%
Negative EPS growth while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-126.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MAXN is at 73.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.48%
Share reduction while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.68%
Negative OCF growth while MAXN is at 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-120.29%
Negative FCF growth while MAXN is at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
118.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-71.86%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-51.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-59829.12%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-185.54%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-283.83%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-3321.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-159.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
22.92%
Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-3.86%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-38.42%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
27.56%
Positive short-term equity growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.29%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.37%
We show growth while MAXN is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.53%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
55.83%
We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
29.59%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MAXN's 3.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
30.25%
We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.