PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
153.84%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MAXN's 73.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
29.81%
EBIT growth below 50% of MAXN's 71.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.02%
Operating income growth under 50% of MAXN's 66.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
33.08%
Net income growth under 50% of MAXN's 73.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
34.04%
EPS growth of 34.04% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MAXN's 73.09%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.01%
Share change of 1.01% while MAXN is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.40%
Diluted share change of 0.40% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.60%
Negative OCF growth while MAXN is at 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.56%
Negative FCF growth while MAXN is at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
308.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-40.06%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-2385.62%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-48.88%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-292.11%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-15021.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2730.84%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-35.33%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
132.63%
Positive growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-41.36%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
25.43%
Positive short-term equity growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.15%
We show growth while MAXN is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.46%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.33%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
3.89%
We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.06%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MAXN's 3.39%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-7.43%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.