PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.83%
Revenue growth under 50% of MAXN's 6.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
22.37%
Positive gross profit growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
312.32%
Positive EBIT growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1056.53%
Positive operating income growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
255.43%
Positive net income growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
248.28%
Positive EPS growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
239.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.84%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MAXN's 13.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
13.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above MAXN's 13.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.55%
Similar OCF growth to MAXN's 164.82%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
139.78%
FCF growth above 1.5x MAXN's 69.40%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-70.49%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-41.23%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-43.85%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
111.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MAXN's 201.37%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
105.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MAXN's 201.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
114.73%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MAXN's 201.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
128.77%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
185.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
113.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.20%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
938.19%
Equity/share CAGR of 938.19% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.40%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MAXN's 6.31%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-3.02%
Negative asset growth while MAXN invests at 15.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
22.02%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MAXN's 8.55%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-16.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.06%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
18.82%
We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.