PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while MAXN is at 47.65%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 114.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while MAXN is at 288.68%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MAXN is at 209.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
149.04%
Slight or no buybacks while MAXN is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
149.04%
Slight or no buyback while MAXN is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
Positive OCF growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
44.58%
FCF growth above 1.5x MAXN's 0.17%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-99.06%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN stands at 382.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-98.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 382.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-97.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 940.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
97.84%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-117.25%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-219.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MAXN is at 304.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-115.25%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MAXN is 304.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-129.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN is 250.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-107.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
32.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 32.36% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-129.31%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-26.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
56.59%
Positive BV/share change while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
We cut SG&A while MAXN invests at 46.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.