PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.24%
Positive revenue growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-253.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-554.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-215.67%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-390.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-296.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-296.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-38.35%
Share reduction while MAXN is at 114.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-38.35%
Reduced diluted shares while MAXN is at 24.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-697.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-612.15%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-98.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MAXN stands at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-97.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-96.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 94.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-15.34%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-12.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-107.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-523.77%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-882.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-111.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-117.92%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.98%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-189.42%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.77%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-70.14%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
223.24%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-151.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
191.33%
We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
We expand SG&A while MAXN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.