PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.39%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-28.35%
Negative gross profit growth while MAXN is at 73.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-194.50%
Negative EBIT growth while MAXN is at 71.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-360.84%
Negative operating income growth while MAXN is at 66.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-375.90%
Negative net income growth while MAXN stands at 73.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-380.00%
Negative EPS growth while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18766.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MAXN is at 73.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.90%
Share change of 0.90% while MAXN is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-50.22%
Reduced diluted shares while MAXN is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.37%
Negative OCF growth while MAXN is at 93.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-68.37%
Negative FCF growth while MAXN is at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-70.54%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-59.76%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-65.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN stands at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
96.53%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-145.05%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
82.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-672.69%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-343.37%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
23.54%
Positive short-term CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-111.62%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-812.15%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-155.81%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.46%
Our AR growth while MAXN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-52.87%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
10.37%
Positive asset growth while MAXN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-19.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
11.00%
We have some new debt while MAXN reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.