PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
552.24%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
70.35%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RUN's 23.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
70.35%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
74.27%
Net income growth under 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
83.33%
EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 456.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 436.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
57.75%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
57.75%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.55%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-637.14%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.90%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.09%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.