PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
23.23%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
49.67%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RUN's 23.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
49.67%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
139.84%
Net income growth under 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
110.69%
EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 456.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
109.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 436.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
162.28%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
187.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7700.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.87%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-78.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RUN stands at 231.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-78.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RUN stands at 64.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-78.34%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
97.87%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
97.87%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.87%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
100.20%
Below 50% of RUN's 1473.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.20%
Below 50% of RUN's 1185.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
100.20%
Below 50% of RUN's 220.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.40%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
31.67%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 18.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.21%
Similar asset growth to RUN's 4.18%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-61.69%
We have a declining book value while RUN shows 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.90%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
329.37%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.