PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.48%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.65%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
66.29%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RUN's 23.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
66.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
77.71%
Net income growth under 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
75.00%
EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 456.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
62.50%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RUN's 436.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
7.66%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.47%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.62%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-188.13%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.93%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
20.88%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 18.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.08%
Similar asset growth to RUN's 4.18%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-4.55%
We have a declining book value while RUN shows 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.01%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
24.49%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.