PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
78.70%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-24.88%
Negative EBIT growth while RUN is at 23.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-125.93%
Negative operating income growth while RUN is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 460.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-87.50%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 456.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-87.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 436.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
11.95%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
14.76%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.06%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
23.51%
FCF growth under 50% of RUN's 156.78%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-39.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RUN stands at 231.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-39.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RUN stands at 64.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-39.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
97.40%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
97.40%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
100.81%
Below 50% of RUN's 1473.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.81%
Below 50% of RUN's 1185.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
100.81%
Below 50% of RUN's 220.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.42%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
221.47%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 18.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
86.59%
Asset growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
16.25%
1.25-1.5x RUN's 11.80%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.51%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
266.44%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.