PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
28.91%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
151.45%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RUN's 23.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
151.45%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
257.74%
Net income growth at 50-75% of RUN's 460.66%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
254.71%
EPS growth at 50-75% of RUN's 456.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
240.65%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of RUN's 436.85%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
3.42%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.97%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 1.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-371.63%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-70.65%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.51%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.82%
Inventory is declining while RUN stands at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
38.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
25.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RUN's 11.80%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
112.50%
Debt growth far above RUN's 3.38%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
38.32%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.12%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.