PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.37%
Negative revenue growth while RUN stands at 12.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
13.53%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
15.18%
EBIT growth 50-75% of RUN's 23.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
18.86%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 460.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 456.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 436.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.33%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.54%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.18%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
743.93%
FCF growth above 1.5x RUN's 156.78%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
495.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
205.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 220.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while RUN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while RUN shows 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.88%
Inventory is declining while RUN stands at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.42%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 4.18%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.64%
Under 50% of RUN's 11.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.68%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.64%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.