PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.22%
Revenue growth under 50% of RUN's 12.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
401.45%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.96%
EBIT growth below 50% of RUN's 23.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.07%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
19.72%
Net income growth under 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-40.00%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 456.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 436.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.22%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.05%
Reduced diluted shares while RUN is at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.96%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-175.51%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6103.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 231.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
6103.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 64.82%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
295.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2525.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2525.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
15668.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
358.17%
Below 50% of RUN's 1473.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
358.17%
Below 50% of RUN's 1185.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1436.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 220.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while RUN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.87%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
31.97%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 18.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.37%
Under 50% of RUN's 11.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
12.52%
Debt growth far above RUN's 3.38%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-126.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.