PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.67%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RUN's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
56.16%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
197.71%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RUN's 23.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
482.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RUN's 0.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
36.18%
Net income growth under 50% of RUN's 460.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-48.15%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 456.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-50.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 436.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.18%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-2.13%
Reduced diluted shares while RUN is at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2691.15%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
166.65%
FCF growth similar to RUN's 156.78%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
419.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
764.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.48%
Below 50% of RUN's 220.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while RUN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.20%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-9.01%
Inventory is declining while RUN stands at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.77%
Asset growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.99%
We have a declining book value while RUN shows 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.58%
Debt growth far above RUN's 3.38%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
20.39%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.07%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.