PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.46%
Negative revenue growth while RUN stands at 12.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
223.64%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-156.30%
Negative EBIT growth while RUN is at 23.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-114.78%
Negative operating income growth while RUN is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1213.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 460.66%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
737.25%
EPS growth above 1.5x RUN's 456.14%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
737.25%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x RUN's 436.85%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.22%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-133.00%
Negative FCF growth while RUN is at 156.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
15.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RUN's 231.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RUN's 64.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
89.04%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.91%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
103.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
249.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
106.39%
Below 50% of RUN's 1473.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
106.39%
Below 50% of RUN's 1185.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
685.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 220.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.31%
Positive short-term equity growth while RUN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.27%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
24.66%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 18.52%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
22.14%
Asset growth above 1.5x RUN's 4.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.16%
Under 50% of RUN's 11.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
43.80%
Debt growth far above RUN's 3.38%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
21.36%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.35%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.