PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.11%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 12.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
294.55%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-215.39%
Negative EBIT growth while RUN is at 23.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-262.81%
Negative operating income growth while RUN is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-150.75%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 460.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-149.67%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 456.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-149.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 436.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.62%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.62%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.36%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
103.24%
FCF growth 50-75% of RUN's 156.78%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RUN's 64.82%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
53.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-88.02%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2819.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RUN is 1185.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1330.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RUN is 220.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.75%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RUN's 72.95%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-3.62%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.64%
Firm’s AR is declining while RUN shows 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.06%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. RUN's 18.52%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-5.28%
Negative asset growth while RUN invests at 4.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-21.84%
We have a declining book value while RUN shows 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
18.12%
Debt growth far above RUN's 3.38%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-16.98%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.