PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.27%
Revenue growth similar to RUN's 17.91%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
12.71%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RUN's 102.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-233.84%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-90.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-91.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-89.47%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-89.47%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while RUN is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RUN's 1.18%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.66%
OCF growth above 1.5x RUN's 22.84%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
41.15%
Positive FCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-52.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RUN stands at 330.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
2.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RUN's 115.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-21.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RUN stands at 59.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
14.74%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
43.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
48.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
46.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-142.56%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-75.77%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-55.61%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while RUN is at 346.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
313.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RUN's 287.49%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
AR growth well above RUN's 8.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-9.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.18%
Negative asset growth while RUN invests at 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
16.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RUN's 2.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.70%
Debt shrinking faster vs. RUN's 6.23%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
47.80%
We increase R&D while RUN cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
20.84%
SG&A growth well above RUN's 8.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.