PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-55.26%
Negative revenue growth while RUN stands at 14.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-139.07%
Negative gross profit growth while RUN is at 388.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while RUN is at 28.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.85%
Negative operating income growth while RUN is at 28.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-65.77%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 258.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while RUN is at 257.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RUN is at 237.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
149.04%
Share count expansion well above RUN's 1.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
149.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above RUN's 16.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.59%
Positive OCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
44.58%
Positive FCF growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-99.06%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RUN stands at 259.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-98.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RUN stands at 33.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-97.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RUN stands at 19.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
97.84%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-117.25%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-219.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RUN is at 387.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-115.25%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RUN is 5696.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-129.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RUN is 409.77%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-107.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
32.36%
Below 50% of RUN's 204.96%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-129.31%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.90%
Firm’s AR is declining while RUN shows 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.26%
Negative asset growth while RUN invests at 2.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
56.59%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RUN's 2.92%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.59%
We’re deleveraging while RUN stands at 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
We cut SG&A while RUN invests at 4.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.