PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1501.77%
Positive revenue growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1407.19%
Positive gross profit growth while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
172.69%
Positive EBIT growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
28.26%
Positive operating income growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
160.27%
Positive net income growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
160.19%
Positive EPS growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
160.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-18.62%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-86.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RUN stands at 203.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-70.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RUN stands at 11.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-47.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RUN stands at 8.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-136.42%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-2146.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-2333.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RUN stands at 16.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-39.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
1647.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
434.26%
Positive short-term CAGR while RUN is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-111.09%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while RUN stands at 177.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-2041.68%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while RUN is at 39.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-157.67%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
511.98%
Our AR growth while RUN is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3542.50%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 17.45%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
33.84%
Positive asset growth while RUN is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
31.65%
Positive BV/share change while RUN is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.35%
We’re deleveraging while RUN stands at 3.49%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.10%
We expand SG&A while RUN cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.