PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.11%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 31.87%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
294.55%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 83.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-215.39%
Negative EBIT growth while SEDG is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-262.81%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-150.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-149.67%
Negative EPS growth while SEDG is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-149.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SEDG is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.62%
Slight or no buybacks while SEDG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.62%
Slight or no buyback while SEDG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.36%
Positive OCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
103.24%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
53.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-88.02%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2819.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1330.25%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.75%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-3.62%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.64%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.06%
We show growth while SEDG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-5.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-21.84%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.12%
We have some new debt while SEDG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-16.98%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.