PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SEDG's 0.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
153.84%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 5.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
29.81%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.48%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
33.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
33.08%
Positive net income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.04%
Positive EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 2.15%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.40%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 1.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.60%
Negative OCF growth while SEDG is at 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.56%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
308.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 201.51%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-40.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 201.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-47.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 201.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-2385.62%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 328.83%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-48.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 328.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-292.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 328.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15021.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is at 392.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-2730.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is 392.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-35.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG is 392.22%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
132.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 132.63% while SEDG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-41.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
25.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.43% while SEDG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SEDG's 20.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.15%
We show growth while SEDG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.46%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.33%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 9.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
3.89%
Debt growth of 3.89% while SEDG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
1.06%
R&D dropping or stable vs. SEDG's 4.94%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-7.43%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.