PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.34%
Negative revenue growth while SEDG stands at 18.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
105.72%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 21.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
57.70%
EBIT growth similar to SEDG's 59.24%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
46.08%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of SEDG's 59.24%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
30.28%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 58.90%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
30.93%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 58.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
30.93%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 56.25%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 0.88%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 2.27%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.51%
Negative OCF growth while SEDG is at 23.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.58%
Negative FCF growth while SEDG is at 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-53.23%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-39.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-1801.75%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 142.91%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-208.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 142.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-14.01%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 142.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-845.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is at 149.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
5.36%
Below 50% of SEDG's 149.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-718.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG is 149.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-38.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 218.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-45.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 218.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-48.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 218.11%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.87%
AR growth well above SEDG's 0.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.93%
We show growth while SEDG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of SEDG's 7.76%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-5.90%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 8.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.60%
We’re deleveraging while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.71%
Our R&D shrinks while SEDG invests at 11.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.93%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 0.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.