PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.43%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-42.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
111.92%
Positive EBIT growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
64.58%
Positive operating income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1454.16%
Positive net income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1511.76%
Positive EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1581.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.70%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 1.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above SEDG's 0.70%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.51%
Positive OCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
107.53%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-48.37%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 165.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 104.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
117.10%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 167.42%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
107.70%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 197.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
110.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 57.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
275.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 167.93% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
135.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 211.43%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
116.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 36.39%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-98.79%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 373.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-98.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 335.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-96.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 131.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.01%
Inventory is declining while SEDG stands at 33.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.95%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 6.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
104.47%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SEDG's 5.47%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-21.12%
Our R&D shrinks while SEDG invests at 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-15.15%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.