PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.36%
Negative revenue growth while SEDG stands at 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-33.63%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 26.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-110.42%
Negative EBIT growth while SEDG is at 5.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-105.75%
Negative operating income growth while SEDG is at 205.87%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-111.73%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 70.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-111.98%
Negative EPS growth while SEDG is at 70.59%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-113.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SEDG is at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.55%
Slight or no buybacks while SEDG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-14.46%
Reduced diluted shares while SEDG is at 4.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-367.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-441.53%
Negative FCF growth while SEDG is at 94.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-61.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 661.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-36.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 152.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-35.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 64.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
86.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 380.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
91.25%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 22.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
85.82%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-1185.23%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is at 429.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
54.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 12.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
65.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-87.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-78.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 263.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-38.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 112.81%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.32%
Our AR growth while SEDG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.55%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 2.51%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.14%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-11.71%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.40%
Debt growth far above SEDG's 4.61%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
53.13%
We increase R&D while SEDG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-9.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.