PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.83%
Revenue growth under 50% of SEDG's 18.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
22.37%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 11.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
312.32%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SEDG's 18.05%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1056.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
255.43%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 49.93%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
248.28%
EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
239.29%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 49.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.84%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 0.68%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.53%
Slight or no buyback while SEDG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.55%
OCF growth above 1.5x SEDG's 60.63%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
139.78%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-70.49%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-41.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 201.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 84.61%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
111.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 142.04%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
105.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 67.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
114.73%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
128.77%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 179.87%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
185.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 104.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
113.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 13.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-83.20%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 432.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-72.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 260.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
938.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 112.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.40%
Firm’s AR is declining while SEDG shows 26.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.23%
We show growth while SEDG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.02%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
22.02%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SEDG's 6.36%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-16.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.06%
Our R&D shrinks while SEDG invests at 12.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
18.82%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 4.42%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.