PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.87%
Revenue growth similar to SEDG's 14.97%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
29.38%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 21.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
510.02%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SEDG's 100.70%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
150.57%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 134.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
314.88%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 64.03%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
316.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 55.56%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 61.54%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 5.91%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
10.66%
Diluted share count expanding well above SEDG's 0.31%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.53%
Positive OCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
68.62%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-49.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 29.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-21.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 262.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 67.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
88.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 106.98%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
84.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
88.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
290.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 122.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
300.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
839.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-65.99%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 1223.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-36.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 301.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
373.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 130.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.10%
AR growth well above SEDG's 17.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.57%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SEDG's 19.37%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
11.78%
Asset growth above 1.5x SEDG's 3.47%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
35.07%
Positive BV/share change while SEDG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.16%
We’re deleveraging while SEDG stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-8.39%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.36%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.