PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.54%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 6.45%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-0.76%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 17.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
76.66%
Positive operating income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-94.39%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.06%
Slight or no buybacks while SEDG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-8.82%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-119.63%
Negative OCF growth while SEDG is at 1902.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.53%
Negative FCF growth while SEDG is at 342.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-50.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 60.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-39.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 263.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-27.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 85.41%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-105.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 232.72%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-119.42%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 87.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-341.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 16.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
103.58%
Similar net income/share CAGR to SEDG's 113.32%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
101.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
22.42%
Positive short-term CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-60.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
222.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 322.74%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
4848.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 133.43%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.03%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SEDG's 15.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
38.80%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 29.90%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of SEDG's 9.28%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.53%
Under 50% of SEDG's 10.99%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.70%
Debt growth far above SEDG's 0.18%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-18.04%
Our R&D shrinks while SEDG invests at 13.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.70%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.