PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.35%
Negative revenue growth while SEDG stands at 5.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.74%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 14.97%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-444.62%
Negative EBIT growth while SEDG is at 1991.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-279.01%
Negative operating income growth while SEDG is at 2892.06%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-817.67%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 564.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-825.00%
Negative EPS growth while SEDG is at 564.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-825.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SEDG is at 571.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.17%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 0.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.56%
Reduced diluted shares while SEDG is at 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1062.88%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-493.32%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-52.73%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 1531.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-9.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 252.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 91.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-155.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 184.85%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
53.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
27.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
31.95%
Below 50% of SEDG's 1495.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
62.15%
Below 50% of SEDG's 203.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-3593.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG is 186.62%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-63.50%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-15.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 318.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
5052.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 137.43%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.77%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SEDG's 29.71%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
20.53%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 19.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-16.16%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 5.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.72%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 7.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-40.99%
We’re deleveraging while SEDG stands at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
30.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SEDG's 1.16%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.61%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 6.68%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.