PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.10%
Revenue growth similar to SEDG's 5.02%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
15.31%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 5.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
44.28%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SEDG's 5.35%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 4.30%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
42.88%
Positive net income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.48%
Positive EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
34.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.29%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.29%
Slight or no buyback while SEDG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.22%
Positive OCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.66%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-44.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 10.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-16.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 251.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 163.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
81.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 11.01%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
88.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-181.21%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-210.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is at 295.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
94.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SEDG's 178.73%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-256.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG is 187.63%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-65.63%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 756.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
1001.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 319.03%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1362.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 140.49%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SEDG's 10.01%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.05%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 12.58%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.45%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 4.45%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-5.37%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 6.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
22.31%
We have some new debt while SEDG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-10.20%
Our R&D shrinks while SEDG invests at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-8.99%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.