PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.13%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-56.88%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
64.12%
Positive EBIT growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-44.93%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
26.00%
Positive net income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-294.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
86.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.04%
Share reduction while SEDG is at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 0.43%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-89.21%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-61.22%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-37.05%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
1.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-159.44%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
13.70%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-281.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-185.83%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
85.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-106.52%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-81.01%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
218.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 248.11%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-26.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 102.66%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.64%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-19.39%
Inventory is declining while SEDG stands at 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-27.56%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.38%
Debt growth far above SEDG's 0.23%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-11.23%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
8.26%
We expand SG&A while SEDG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.