PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.69%
Negative revenue growth while SEDG stands at 28.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.73%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 115.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-71.58%
Negative EBIT growth while SEDG is at 61.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
104.85%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 61.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 65.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-83.87%
Negative EPS growth while SEDG is at 66.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-99.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SEDG is at 66.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
6.32%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 1.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
115.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above SEDG's 1.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 174.16%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
89.76%
FCF growth under 50% of SEDG's 29917.72%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-69.07%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-61.18%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-48.88%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
96.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 112.59%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
96.92%
Positive OCF/share growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 120.11%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
239.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1296.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
153.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-109.80%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-2088.09%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-153.70%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.40%
Our AR growth while SEDG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-50.20%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while SEDG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.20%
Positive BV/share change while SEDG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.