PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.39%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 16.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-28.35%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 13.41%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-194.50%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 19.48%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-360.84%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 21.60%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-375.90%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 1.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-380.00%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 20.29%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-18766.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 12.46%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.90%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-50.22%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.27%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.37%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 15.64%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-68.37%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 12.05%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-70.54%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is -14.94%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-59.76%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -58.93%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-65.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -69.93%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
96.53%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 42.17% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-145.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 92.17%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
82.95%
3Y OCF/share growth 50-75% of Solar median. Guy Spier might worry about reduced short-term competitiveness in generating cash.
-672.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of -18.56%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-343.37%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -39.08%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
23.54%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
-111.62%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is -51.42%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-812.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 23.40%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-155.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is -22.94%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.46%
Slight AR growth while Solar cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-52.87%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
10.37%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.89%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-19.39%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 27.96%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
11.00%
Slightly rising debt while Solar median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.